Skip to content

Why Nail Fungus Lights DON’T Work

Share this article

Watch this on YouTube.

At-home nail fungus lights promise an easy fix: just shine a special light on your nails daily, and watch the fungus disappear. Sounds straightforward enough—but does it really work? Before we dive into the effectiveness of these over-the-counter devices, let’s take a step back and ask the bigger question: Can light therapy even treat nail fungus? Surprisingly, yes—there is some legitimate science behind it.

In a small clinical study, patients with nail fungus underwent eight sessions of either photodynamic therapy (PDT) or intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy. The results were impressive: a 70–80% cure rate along with noticeable symptom relief. This success in a clinical setting might make you wonder if those nail fungus lights you see online can offer similar results. Unfortunately, they can’t—and here’s why.

Why Nail Fungus Lights Don’t Work

Most consumer-grade devices—typically priced between $50 and $100—aren’t remotely comparable to the professional tools used in medical treatments. The therapies that showed success in the study were highly specific and involved complex technologies.

Photodynamic therapy starts with applying a special chemical to the infected nail. This chemical is then activated using a red laser at a precise wavelength. In the clinical trial, a device called Periowave® was used—a professional medical tool found only in healthcare settings and operated by trained providers. You can’t buy this kind of equipment online, and it’s not meant for casual at-home use.

Intense pulsed light therapy, on the other hand, uses broad-spectrum light to generate heat and target fungal infections. While there are consumer IPL devices (commonly marketed for hair removal), these versions are far less powerful than the clinical machines used for nail fungus. The study relied on the Dye-VL-F module from Alma Lasers, a device that retails for upwards of $14,000. For comparison, many at-home nail fungus lights use low-energy red or blue LEDs—barely strong enough to warm the surface of your nail, let alone penetrate deep enough to kill the fungus.

In fact, some of these products closely resemble basic nail polish dryers, rebranded with pseudoscientific claims. They lack the necessary intensity, wavelength precision, and delivery method to effectively treat fungal infections.

Effective light-based therapy requires more than just the right kind of light. In the clinical setting, patients pre-treated their nails with a 40% urea cream for several days to soften the nail plate. This step allowed the light to reach the deeper layers of the nail, where the fungus actually thrives. None of the popular at-home devices account for this essential step, nor are they designed to be used in combination with it.

Real Light Therapy for Fungal Nail Infections

To be clear, photodynamic and intense pulsed light therapies do show potential—especially for people who can’t tolerate antifungal pills or who haven’t responded to topical treatments. PDT works by activating a chemical like methylene blue with a laser, creating reactive oxygen that destroys fungal cells. IPL, on the other hand, uses bursts of light to generate heat and damage the fungal structure directly. Both treatments are typically done in a clinical setting, with proper supervision and medical-grade equipment.

Dr. Brian’s Summary

Let’s be honest. The idea that a cheap, handheld gadget will cure your toenail fungus while you binge-watch Netflix sounds more like wishful thinking than medicine. These at-home nail fungus lights are often little more than glorified cosmetic tools. They aren’t strong enough, precise enough, or properly designed to treat a real fungal infection.

If you’re dealing with persistent nail fungus, the most effective approach is still to see a healthcare provider. Whether it’s prescription medications, proper nail debridement, or advanced therapies like PDT or IPL, professional treatment offers your best chance at truly getting rid of the infection.

Learn more about

Citations

Alberdi E, Gómez C. Efficiency of methylene blue-mediated photodynamic therapy vs intense pulsed light in the treatment of onychomycosis in the toenails. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2019 Mar;35(2):69-77. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12420. Epub 2018 Sep 17. PMID: 30168611.

Ma W, Si C, Kasyanju Carrero LM, Liu HF, Yin XF, Liu J, Xu Y, Zhou B. Laser treatment for onychomycosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(48):e17948. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017948. PMID: 31770202; PMCID: PMC6890331.


See also

  • Doctor Reviews: BurnJaro
    BurnJaro is a sketchy supplement that fails to clearly list its ingredients and likely contains doses too low to be useful for weight loss.
  • Doctor Reviews: Liquid I.V.
    Liquid I.V. contains more sugar and less salt than the WHO oral rehydration solution, making it unsuitable for treating medical dehydration.
  • Why Nail Fungus Lights DON’T Work
    While laser light therapy can be an effective medical treatment for nail fungus, the over-the-counter lights aren’t the same.
  • Doctor Reviews: Prime Biome
    Prime Biome is a mild probiotic that offers limited benefits for gut health and is unlikely to have any effect on skin health.
  • The Truth About AREDS 2
    AREDS 2 is well-supported for eye health, including AMD, but some nutrients, like zinc, may be higher than needed.

Share this article
Tags:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *